Donald Trump is on the brink of facing a momentous decision, where his vast real estate business empire might be ordered to ‘dissolve’ due to repeated financial misrepresentations to lenders.
Will Trump’s Empire Survive?
This impending judgment places him among a select group previously penalized under New York’s stringent anti-fraud law, a list typically comprising scam marketers and con artists who faced similar severe consequences.
A Legal Rarity
An analysis by the Associated Press spanning nearly seven decades of civil cases under this law revealed that such a penalty has been imposed only a dozen times before.
Trump’s case, however, differs significantly. It’s the only major business under threat of shutdown without clear victims and substantial losses.
Fair Play in Business
In Trump’s lengthy civil trial, state lawyers have asserted that the principles of fair play in business alone warrant a severe penalty.
Nevertheless, they do not endorse the notion of liquidating his businesses and properties, a proposal put forth by the judge. Some legal experts express apprehension that if the judge chooses to penalize the former president with this extreme measure, it could set a precedent for courts to dissolve companies more readily in future cases.
A ‘Death Penalty’
“This is a basically a death penalty for a business,” Columbia University law professor Eric Talley stated. “Is he getting his just desserts because of the fraud, or because people don’t like him?”
Political and Legal Roadblocks
With the New York state court decision looming, following Friday’s federal defamation case verdict that required Trump to pay $83.3 million to columnist E. Jean Carroll, the Republican presidential frontrunner is grappling with a whirlwind of four criminal trials during his campaign to return to the White House.
Trump insists that the Democrats are exploiting the legal system to unfairly attack him and thwart his political ambitions.
A Historical Review
A review by AP of nearly 150 cases since the enactment of New York’s ‘repeated fraud’ statute in 1956 reveals that in almost all instances where a company was seized, the determining factors were victim impact and losses.
Customers were often defrauded – losing money, receiving defective products, or not getting services they paid for.
Businesses are Seized for Fraud
The takeover of businesses usually represented a final measure to halt ongoing frauds and safeguard potential victims, including cases like a sham psychologist selling dubious treatments, a counterfeit lawyer making false promises about law school admissions, and businessmen who cheated people out of their home deeds under the guise of financial advice.
Still Misleading?
Trump’s company ceased sending exaggerated financial figures to Deutsche Bank two years ago, a change that followed a lawsuit, yet other financial documents still showed errors. While Trump’s personal guarantee on loans might have influenced lower interest rates, the exact benefit remains unclear.
Deutsche Bank, despite not openly complaining, hasn’t quantified any potential losses.
Experts Weigh In
Experts disagree on the implications: New York real estate lawyer Adam Leitman Bailey deems it a ‘horrible precedent,’ whereas University of Michigan law professor William Thomas questions the extent of victim impact.
Business Empire at Stake
Trump faces the threat of losing control over his business holdings, a situation exacerbated by State Supreme Court Judge Arthur Engoron’s fraud ruling. Engoron’s decision, now under appeal, might lead to the ‘dissolution’ of Trump’s key properties, including Trump Tower and his assets in Florida, Chicago, and Scotland.
Defining ‘Dissolution’
It is worth noting that the scope of ‘dissolution’ remains undefined, leaving uncertain whether it means liquidating property-controlling entities or the properties themselves.
Exaggerated Property Claims
Trump’s financial statements for 11 years included disputed property valuations, such as overstating his penthouse’s size and misclassifying properties’ status. This led to Letitia James’s case where a lending expert suggested Deutsche Bank lost $168 million in interest due to these inaccuracies.
Financial Overstatements
Despite Trump’s exaggerated personal wealth claims, Deutsche Bank, often reducing Trump’s estimates, proceeded with loans through its private wealth division, eyeing potential investment management opportunities.
Innocent or Political Target?
Trump, insisting on his innocence, calls the trial a politically motivated ‘witch hunt,’ stressing that lenders always performed their own analysis and were fully repaid.”
Read Next: What Really Causes Donald Trump’s Skin to be So Orange
Former President Donald Trump’s distinctive orange skin has captivated attention, sparking curiosity about its evolution from average pale over the years:
What Really Causes Donald Trump’s Skin to be So Orange
27 Things MAGA Movement Ruined Forever for People
How the MAGA movement left its mark on individuals and disrupted certain aspects of our everyday life forever:
27 Things MAGA Movement Ruined Forever for People
Court Finally Unseals Secretive Case of Jan 6 Offender
Samuel Lazar sentenced for Jan. 6 insurrection; previously confidential case now revealed: Court Finally Unseals Secretive Case of Jan 6 Offender
Defamation lawsuit against Kari Lake advances while people compare her to Rudy Giuliani
Kari Lake loses First Amendment right to accuse Maricopa County recorder; Arizona Republic ponders if she’s channeling Rudy Giuliani in her sleep : Defamation lawsuit against Kari Lake advances while people compare her to Rudy Giuliani
More Democrats are flipping in a crucial swing state than Republicans
In Pennsylvania, a significant number of registered Democrats flipping is sending an unflattering signal to President Biden: More Democrats are flipping in a crucial swing state than Republicans
