Court Rules Christian Photographer Can Refuse LGBTQ+ Couples

hand of LGBT women holding together with rainbow ribbon symbol; concept of LGBT pride, LGBTQ people, lgbt rights campaign, same gender marriage

The Fourth Circuit Court ruled to allow a Christian photographer to refuse to work with LGBTQ+ couples. The ruling comes during backsliding on LGBTQ+ rights in many parts of the US.

The photographer

Female photographer working in her studio hands close up and digital camera on foreground
Illustration. Image via Depositphotos.com

Bob Updegrove is a Christian photographer. Like many, he shoots weddings as part of his job.

The law

Illustration. Image credit: Shutterstock

In 2020, Virginia added gender identity and sexual orientation to its non-discrimination laws. In theory, that would prevent photographers like Updegrove from refusing to take pictures of same-sex weddings.

Instant complaints

Illustration. Image credit: Shutterstock

Updegrove filed a pre-enforcement challenge. That means he wanted to prove the law was unfair, even though it hadn’t affected him yet.

Not alone

shake hand business
Illustration. Image credit: Shutterstock

Updegrove wasn’t alone. He was helped by the Alliance Defending Freedom (ADF).

Hate group, by The Southern Poverty Law Center

Warning, whisper, stop, secret
Illustration. Image credit: Depositphotos

The Southern Poverty Law Center has designated the ADF as a hate group. Updegrove’s lawsuit is just one of many the group has filed in recent years in a broad attempt to reverse LGBTQ+ protections.

If, at first, you don’t succeed…

Denver, USA - May 25, 2016: The main entrance of the Colorado Supreme Court building. A man is coming down the stairs.
Image by mixmotive via Depositphotos.com

The district court dismissed Updegrove’s initial challenge. That didn’t stop the photographer or the ADF from appealing to higher courts. 

Victory

Illustration. Image credit: Shutterstock

The appeal was successful. Updegrove settled with the state of Virginia.

The settlement

Judge, Judge Holding Documents, In court, Table
Image by DepositPhotos.com

Per the settlement, Virginia cannot force Updegrove to photograph weddings between same-sex couples. The state also cannot prevent Updegrove from promoting his anti-LGBTQ+ policy.

Restrictions

Illustration. Image credit: Shutterstock

Virginia is also barred from preventing Updegrove from quizzing prospective clients. He must be allowed to ask clients if they want a photographer who would work with same-sex couples.

Justification

Image via DepositPhotos.com

The ADF won the case by referring to a Supreme Court decision in which they were also involved. The case is called 303 Creative v. Elenis.

Supreme Court case

Law, Court, Flag
Image via Shutterstock.com

The 303 Creative case involved a Christian web designer, also represented by the ADF and the state of Colorado.

Interesting case

Illustration. Image credit: Shutterstock

As The New Republic reported, the 303 Creative case was full of holes. For one thing, the case claims that a man requested a gay wedding website—but when asked, the man named asserted that he had never made such a request. At the time, he was married—to a woman.

Result

gay wedding proposal. hand holds two wedding rings on lgbt flag background. same-sex marriage, homosexuality and legalized relationship of two lgbt people.
Image by Depositphotos.com

Nevertheless, the Court ruled in 303 Creative that Colorado’s anti-discrimination law violated Smith’s First Amendment right to freedom of speech. Under the law, the designer may have been forced to make a website for a same-sex couple.

Freedom or something like it 

Two wedding rings and rainbow gay flag on wooden background
Image by Depositphotos.com

At the time, LGBTQ+ advocates feared this decision would apply to similar cases. Updegrove’s victory shows those fears are coming true.

ADF’s statement 

Media Interview - journalists with microphones interviewing formal dressed person
Image by Depositphotos.com

“This victory for Bob underscores how the 303 Creative decision will protect countless Americans from government censorship and coercion,” a group member said. 

ADF, in their own words 

Businessman writing on paper notes, to communicate with colleagues in the background
Photo by Depositphotos.com

The ADF describes itself as a “legal organization committed to protecting religious freedom, free speech, the sanctity of life, parental rights, and God’s design for marriage and family.” In practice, that manifests as actions intended to reduce the rights of LGBTQ+ people and women, reports claim. 

More from AllThingsFinance: Court Finally Unseals Secretive Case of Jan 6 Offender

Image by Gallagher Photography / Shutterstock.com

Samuel Lazar sentenced for Jan. 6 insurrection; previously confidential case now revealed: Court Finally Unseals Secretive Case of Jan 6 Offender

Jack Smith continues pushing Judge Cannon, reminding her that “the speedy trial clock” is ticking

Image by palinchak via Depositphotos.com

Jack Smith urges Judge Aileen Cannon for a speedy trial in a classified documents case involving ex-President Trump: Jack Smith continues pushing Judge Cannon, reminding her that “the speedy trial clock” is ticking

Defamation lawsuit against Kari Lake advances while people compare her to Rudy Giuliani

Image by lev radin / Shutterstock.com

Kari Lake loses First Amendment right to accuse Maricopa County recorder; Arizona Republic ponders if she’s channeling Rudy Giuliani in her sleep : Defamation lawsuit against Kari Lake advances while people compare her to Rudy Giuliani

More Democrats are flipping in a crucial swing state than Republicans

Image by palinchak via Depositphotos.com

In Pennsylvania, a significant number of registered Democrats flipping is sending an unflattering signal to President Biden: More Democrats are flipping in a crucial swing state than Republicans