U.S. States Consider New Laws to Legally Define "Man" and "Woman" Based on Their Reproductive System

A number of states are currently debating laws that aim to establish “man” and “woman” based on reproductive anatomy.

Gender Identity vs. Biological Sex

This legislation, referred to as the “Women’s Bill of Rights” by Republican members, is currently seen in places like West Virginia, Iowa, and Georgia, stirring considerable debate.

Progress or Problem?

Illustration. Image credit: Depositphotos

The primary concern revolves around its effects on the transgender community, which has been the focus of various conservative-led restrictions across the country.

Potential Discrimination

Illustration. Image by Depositphotos.com

These bills continue to generate intense debate in legislative committees, with a significant number of critics voicing their opposition.

Opponents of the legislation argue that such restrictive definitions could lead to a failure to legally recognize transgender individuals, potentially resulting in discrimination and flawed identification procedures.

Bills Gain Support

Supporters, on the other hand, claim that these measures are designed to ensure the safety, privacy, and accuracy of public records by defining gender through specific biological criteria.

Reproductive System Definitions

The proposed bills in West Virginia, Georgia, and Iowa seek to legally define the terms “man” and “woman” based on reproductive biology.

These bills specify that an individual would be classified as a woman or a man if they possess, previously possessed, will possess, or would have possessed a reproductive system that produces, transports, and utilizes eggs or sperm for fertilization, respectively.

Legal Classifications

These bills also acknowledge exceptions for intersex individuals or those with a developmental or genetic disorder that affects their sex development. This includes those who have experienced a “historical accident” impacting their reproductive system.

Gender Expression vs. Legal Terms

Illustration. Image credit: Shutterstock

In these bills, the definitions of “man,” “woman,” “girl,” “boy,” “father,” “mother,” “male,” and “female” are all tied to an individual’s biological sex and reproductive system, rather than their gender expression or identity.

Cultural Roles vs. Biological Status

To provide context, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) differentiates between sex and gender. The CDC defines gender as the cultural roles, behaviors, activities, and attributes that a society considers appropriate for people based on their biological sex.

What Is Sex?

On the other hand, sex is defined by the CDC as an individual’s biological status, categorized as male, female, or something else. This status is assigned at birth and is associated with physical attributes like anatomy and chromosomes.

Legal Implications

These distinctions are important because the proposed bills focus on biological and reproductive criteria to define sex, which is a different approach from how gender identity and expression are understood in a broader cultural and social context.

Intersex and Transgender

The legislation in West Virginia, Iowa, and Georgia reflects a specific perspective on sex and gender, with significant implications for various groups, particularly the intersex and transgender communities.

Two Sexes Only

West Virginia’s legislation asserts that there are only two sexes, male and female, explicitly stating that intersex individuals do not constitute a third sex.

This stance is based on the idea that sex is a binary and clearly definable category, not accounting for the biological variations that intersex individuals represent.

Iowa Governor Backs Bill

close up of conference meeting speacher gestures. Politician, businessman, law — Image by Depositphotos.com

Iowa Governor Kim Reynolds, in supporting her state’s legislation, emphasizes the uniqueness of biological differences between women and men, echoing the belief in distinct and inherent differences between the two traditionally recognized sexes.

Facility Regulations and Gender Laws

The proposed bills would have broad implications across various areas of legislative code. They aim to regulate the use of single-sex facilities, such as locker rooms, rape crisis centers, prisons, domestic violence shelters, and restrooms.

Erase Trans People from Public Life?

Specifically, these regulations would impact transgender individuals, potentially restricting their access to facilities that align with their gender identity and limiting their ability to change gender markers on identification documents.

LGBTQ+ Protections Under Threat

In Georgia, the bill goes further by removing “sexual orientation and gender” from the categories considered in hate crime legislation.

This change could have significant impact on the protection of LGBTQ+ individuals under hate crime laws, potentially reducing the legal recognition and protection against crimes motivated by bias against these groups.

Sex Discrimination in Legal Terms

Iowa’s proposed bill introduces a specific interpretation of how sex-based discrimination should be understood and addressed within the state.

The bill states: “Any state law, policy, or program that prohibits discrimination on the basis of sex shall be construed to forbid unfair treatment of females or males in relation to similarly situated members of the opposite sex.”

Nationwide Trends

The passage of this bill in Iowa would align with similar policies that have already been enacted in at least four other states: Montana, Tennessee, North Dakota, and Kansas.