Special Counsel Jack Smith, in a routine legal document released on Friday, forcefully countered Donald Trump’s allegations that his criminal case, stemming from accusations of mishandling classified documents, is affected by political bias and legal misconduct.
Setting the Record Straight
The 68-page brief opened with Smith’s team aiming to debunk the ex-president’s claims about the case’s nature. “It is necessary to set the record straight on the underlying facts that led to this prosecution,” the prosecutors stated.
“The government will clear the air on those issues … because the defendants’ misstatements, if unanswered, leave a highly misleading impression.”
Inside the Mar-a-Lago
The document then detailed the sequence of events that made prosecutors suspect Trump of storing extensive classified materials at his Mar-a-Lago residence.
A Legal Breakdown
Contrary to Trump’s portrayal of a politically motivated witch hunt, the prosecutors pointed out that federal representatives from the National Archives, intelligence community, and White House counsel’s office employed “measures” and “incremental” actions to recover the documents.
Document Retrieval
This process included collaboration with some of Trump’s own appointed advisors, escalating only after the former president’s persistent non-compliance.
DOJ’s Unusual Approach
The style of the legal brief is somewhat atypical for the Justice Department. Though directed at U.S. District Judge Aileen Cannon, the filing occasionally resembled an opening statement to a potential future jury or the introductory section of a report intended for public disclosure.
Uncertain Legal Grounds
It remains uncertain whether the “misconceptions” the prosecutors aim to clear up are concerns they suspect Cannon might harbor, whether they are addressing a broader audience, or how Cannon, a Trump appointee based in Fort Pierce, Florida, will react to this strategy.
A Battle Over Government Documents
The core of the prosecution’s brief is designed to counteract the requests by Trump and his two co-defendants, Walt Nauta and Carlos DeOliveira, for access to a wide array of government documents.
Seeking Extended Access
The defense argues these documents could aid in their clients’ defense. They have requested Judge Cannon to treat large executive branch agencies and the White House as extensions of Smith’s prosecution team.
The Beginning’
Such a ruling could grant the defendants access to files beyond the usual evidence-sharing in criminal trials. The filing reveals new aspects of the investigation’s beginnings, especially regarding Trump’s representatives to the National Archives initiating discussions with key White House officials about retrieving missing documents.
Political Witch Hunt?
Despite Trump’s portrayal of the Biden White House’s involvement as politically motivated, Smith’s team depicted it as limited, necessary, and acknowledged by Trump’s aides, who raised no objections.
Innocuous or Conspiratorial?
A recurring theme in the prosecutors’ document is the contrast between Trump’s portrayal of a unified “Biden administration” working against him, and the reality of various agency career officials performing their individual duties in standard and even “innocuous” ways, as per the brief.
Grave Implications
The prosecution’s brief includes factual assertions that cast Trump’s actions in a more severe and grave light.
Trump’s Risky Document Storage
In addressing the defense’s demand for additional information from the Secret Service, the prosecutors highlight that their engagement with the agency responsible for protecting the president and his family accentuates Trump’s carelessness in storing a substantial quantity of classified information at his Florida residence, which doubles as a social club and a venue for political and social gatherings with extensive guest lists.
Mar-a-Lago’s Guest Access
The prosecution’s filing reveals that, according to the Secret Service, “approximately 48,000 guests who visited Mar-a-Lago between January 2021 and May 2022, while classified documents were at the property, only 2,200 had their names checked and only 2,900 passed through magnetometers.”
The Start of Trump’s Troubles
Initially, Special Counsel Jack Smith has requested that the court prevent former President Trump from launching “political attacks” during his trial for the federal criminal prosecution related to the alleged subversion of the 2020 election.
A Call for Judicial Restraint
Smith is urging the judge to forbid Trump from suggesting that he is a victim of selective prosecution and to restrict the introduction of certain evidence.
Read Next: What Really Causes Donald Trump’s Skin to be So Orange
Former President Donald Trump’s distinctive orange skin has captivated attention, sparking curiosity about its evolution from average pale over the years: