Legal Analysts Condemn Justice Alito’s Comments During Trump Eligibility Hearing

Judge, Judge Holding Documents, In court, Table

On Thursday, the Supreme Court heard oral arguments in the case to determine whether the Colorado state Supreme Court was correct to rule Trump ineligible to appear on the ballot. According to two legal analysts, Chief Justice Samuel Alito’s comments were veiled threats.

The situation

Illustration. Image credit: Depositphotos

“Alito was saying: ‘Well, if you allow Colorado to knock Trump off the ballot, there’ll be more lawsuits by people who are willing to weaponize the legal system,’” Dahlia Lithwick of Slate explained. “I guess there’s only one answer to that, the answer that Jason Murray gave, which was that courts actually do know what to do with frivolous, threatening lawsuits that have no point.”

Barely veiled

close up of conference meeting speacher gestures. Politician, businessman, law
Image by Depositphotos.com

“Another answer,” Lithwick continued, “could be: ‘I’m sorry, Justice Alito, are you threatening me?’”

The big difference

Denver, USA - May 25, 2016: The main entrance of the Colorado Supreme Court building. A man is coming down the stairs.
Image by mixmotive via Depositphotos.com

“It’s a threat that if a majority of the court allows Colorado to remove Trump from the ballot,” Lithwick explained, “justices like Alito are going to come out swinging for the frivolous, ridiculous cases that follow — which really should not be compared to this one, since it’s very much rooted in the Constitution.”

The case in question

Image by Depositphotos.com

The Colorado state Supreme Court’s verdict was based on Section 3 of the 14th Amendment, which specifies that any officer of the US who “engages in insurrection” should not be eligible to hold office. Maine’s secretary of state also agreed that Trump should be barred from the ballot.

Arguing against

Photo by Eduardo Munoz Alvarez / POOL / AFP

One of the arguments made by Trump’s lawyers, however, was that — even if Trump did “engage in insurrection,” which they deny — he should only be removed by Congress, and only after he actually won the presidency. 

Just a small problem

hand raise
Image by DepositPhotos.com

However, that would leave the decision up to a group of legislators that might acquit Trump for political reasons. Over 60 House Republicans recently signed a resolution asserting that Trump did not engage in an insurrection.

Threatening democracy 

Image by Depositphotos.com

Alito’s comment was “a threat that red states will try to retaliate,” Lithwick argued. “Ron DeSantis will remove Joe Biden from the ballot because he’s a traitor or a Chinese spy or whatever other reason — just fill in the blank — and Sam Alito will be ready to let it happen.”

Self-centered 

Illustration. Image credit: Depositphotos

Mark Joseph Stern agreed with Lithwick, adding that the conservative justices “kept fretting that a ruling for Colorado could lead to such dangerous places.” “It was all consequence-based judging!” he elaborated. “From top to bottom! I think that’s another example of the hypocrisy disparity between the different sides of the court.”

Ridiculous

Warning, whisper, stop, secret
Illustration. Image credit: Depositphotos

Lithwick slammed Alito’s tone as “menacing” and his veiled threats “mob-like.” It was as if Alito was saying, “Nice democracy you got — it’d be a shame if something happened to it.”

Helping hand

Image by Depositphotos.com

According to The Nation’s legal analyst, Elie Mystal, Alito also jumped in to help Trump lawyer Jonathan Mitchell when he seemed to be struggling. At one point, after multiple judges pointed out that Mitchell’s argument wasn’t a constitutional one, Alito came “to the rescue” and rephrased the argument for the lawyer.

Keeping the case alive

X twitter social network on laptop screen.
Photo by Depositphotos.com

Alito threw Mitchell “a lifeline,” legal analyst Norm Eisen agreed on X. A professor called Alito’s rephrased version of Mitchell’s statement a “weird argument.”

Bizarre defense

Photo by Eduardo Munoz Alvarez / POOL / AFP

Trump’s lawyers also argued in a pre-hearing filing that barring Trump from the ballot would be “anti-democratic.” However, the Constitution bars plenty of people from the ballot for various reasons, such as citizenship and age. Is it anti-democratic that people under the age of 35 are ineligible to run for president? 

Read Next: What Really Causes Donald Trump’s Skin to be So Orange

Photo by stock_photo_world / Shutterstock.com

Former President Donald Trump’s distinctive orange skin has captivated attention, sparking curiosity about its evolution from average pale over the years:

What Really Causes Donald Trump’s Skin to be So Orange

21 of the Biggest Lies in American History

Image by Depositphotos.com

Dive into the shadows of American history as we explore 21 of its biggest lies that have left an indelible mark on the nation’s narrative:

21 of the Biggest Lies in American History

32 Things We Once Highly Respected but Are a Complete Joke Now

Image credit: Rainer Puster via Canva.com

Discover the amusing downfall of once-respected entities in our changing world:

32 Things We Once Highly Respected but Are a Complete Joke Now

23 of Donald Trump’s Most Hilarious Moments as President

Image by Evan El-Amin / Shutterstock.com

Explore the lighter side of Donald Trump’s presidency with 23 hilariously memorable moments that left the nation in stitches:

23 of Donald Trump’s Most Hilarious Moments as President

27 Things MAGA Movement Ruined Forever for People

Photo by MANDEL NGAN / AFP

How the MAGA movement left its mark on individuals and disrupted certain aspects of our everyday life forever:

27 Things MAGA Movement Ruined Forever for People