SCOTUS Pressured to Ignore Public Reaction and Disqualify Trump

Law above all, and no exception for Trump – a sentiment powerfully articulated by a conservative columnist, urging the U.S. Supreme Court to consider it before their final decision which will seal Trump’s fate in the ongoing presidential race.

Is Trump Above the Law?

Illustration. Image credit: Windover Way Photography / Shutterstock.com

In his New York Times piece, David French insists that the Supreme Court must ignore the potential reactions of Donald Trump’s supporters if he’s barred from running for office.

French’s stance is clear: the law must be the guiding principle. 

Looming Violence

Illustration, Image credit: mikeledray via Depositphotos

French also supports the Colorado Supreme Court’s decision to disqualify Trump from the ballot under the 14th Amendment, stating it’s time to stop fretting about potential violence from Trump’s actions.

Nation Awaits

Law, Court, Flag
Image via Shutterstock.com

French further elaborated, saying that the Supreme Court’s upcoming decision on the Civil War-era amendment as it relates to the former president will probably polarize the nation. He believes the justices should confront this reality head-on, rather than look for ways around it.

Landmark Decisions

Image via DepositPhotos.com

French emphasized the need for the court to show the same resolve as in landmark cases like Brown v. Board of Education and the recent Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization ruling, which significantly disrupted women’s rights to private health decisions.

Breaking the Cycle of “Lies”

Image by Depositphotos.com

Warning about the alleged misleading tactics employed by Trump and his allies, French noted, “This is where we are, and have now been for years: The Trump movement commits threats, violence and lies. And then it tries to escape accountability for those acts through more threats, more violence and more lies.” 

Nation at Risk

Illustration. Image credit: thenews2.com via Depositphotos

Addressing the “but the consequences” reasoning against disqualifying Trump, French views it as an implicit acknowledgment that punishing Trump for his role in the Jan. 6 violence could provoke more violence. 

“Enough”

Image by Joseph Sohm / Shutterstock.com

“Enough. It’s time to apply the plain language of the Constitution to Trump’s actions and remove him from the ballot — without fear of the consequences. Republics are not maintained by cowardice,” he added. 

A Dangerous Game

Illustration. Image credit: Shutterstock

French argues that endlessly debating the precise definition of “insurrection” is a never-ending task. He argues while Trump wasn’t aiming for a separate republic, his goal was to “illegally” maintain control over the executive branch.

“His foot soldiers didn’t wear gray or deploy cannons, but they did storm the United States Capitol, something the Confederate Army could never accomplish,” he explained. 

Reasonable Hopes

Illustration. Image credit: Shutterstock

Based on French’s logic, he suggests that it wouldn’t be unreasonable for a conservative Supreme Court to apply Section 3 to Trump. He also believes it’s within reason to expect the court to involve itself in a presidential race and to make rulings “that have a profound and destabilizing effect” on the political landscape of America.

Integrity vs. Public Reaction

Image by Depositphotos.com

French further advises that the Supreme Court should not allow the “fear” of public backlash to prevent it from upholding the clear wording of the Constitution, noting that Americans are currently in the midst of the crisis that the amendment was specifically intended to tackle

Lost Wisdom?

Lawyer, writing
Image by Depositphotos.com

Highlighting a potential outcome, French warns, “If the court rules against Trump, the nation will be told to brace for violence. That’s what seditionists do.” 

He then remarks on the contemporary GOP, “Republicans are rightly proud of their Civil War-era history. The Party of Lincoln, as it was known, helped save the Union, and it was the Party of Lincoln that passed the 14th Amendment and ratified it in statehouses across the land. The wisdom of the old Republican Party should now save us from the fecklessness and sedition of the new.

On Edge

Illustration. Image by Depositphotos.com

The Supreme Court’s decision looms, and America is on edge. It’s more than a Trump issue – it’s a crucial test of how our Constitution stands up today, whose impending decision will shape Trump’s future in the present presidential race.

Read Next: What Really Causes Donald Trump’s Skin to be So Orange

Photo by stock_photo_world / Shutterstock.com

Former President Donald Trump’s distinctive orange skin has captivated attention, sparking curiosity about its evolution from average pale over the years:

What Really Causes Donald Trump’s Skin to be So Orange

21 of the Biggest Lies in American History

Image by Depositphotos.com

Dive into the shadows of American history as we explore 21 of its biggest lies that have left an indelible mark on the nation’s narrative:

21 of the Biggest Lies in American History

32 Things We Once Highly Respected but Are a Complete Joke Now

Image credit: Rainer Puster via Canva.com

Discover the amusing downfall of once-respected entities in our changing world:

32 Things We Once Highly Respected but Are a Complete Joke Now

23 of Donald Trump’s Most Hilarious Moments as President

Image by Evan El-Amin / Shutterstock.com

Explore the lighter side of Donald Trump’s presidency with 23 hilariously memorable moments that left the nation in stitches:

23 of Donald Trump’s Most Hilarious Moments as President

27 Things MAGA Movement Ruined Forever for People

Photo by MANDEL NGAN / AFP

How the MAGA movement left its mark on individuals and disrupted certain aspects of our everyday life forever:

27 Things MAGA Movement Ruined Forever for People